<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Estibot.com Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://estibotpro.com/blog/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://estibotpro.com/blog</link>
	<description>Life, Domain Names and Everything</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 02:57:54 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on New tools you did not know about + how to get your money back and then some by Tony</title>
		<link>http://estibotpro.com/blog/2012/02/new-tools-you-did-not-know-about-how-to-get-your-money-back-and-then-some/comment-page-1/#comment-385</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 02:57:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://estibotpro.com/blog/?p=242#comment-385</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve had an estibot pro membership since 2009 or so which cost for an annual $149/yr via subscription on PayPal.  Last year, Esa required me to change my payment type to CC and increased the fee to $19.99/mo which I accepted and have been paying.  Over the weekend, I was billed by PayPal for $149 because I guess the subscription was still active so I emailed Esa to give me a refund since it was an old subcription and that I have already been billed on his new monthly fee schedule (double payment).  I forwarded that request to all of Esa&#039;s known email addresses.  It&#039;s been over a day now and still no reply and so I went into PayPal and canceled the subscription so that I wouldn&#039;t get double billed again next year and filed a dispute for the $149 charge.  

I log into Estibot today to find that because I canceled the PayPal subscription, my account membership was canceled as well even though my payment type is clearly by CC and not by paypal.  I have emailed Esa about this issue and asked for my account to be reactivated but don&#039;t expect a reply from recent experience.  

For me to reactivate manually, I would have to get charged at a new rate of $29.99/mo for the novice level membership.  I think this is all ridiculous as I&#039;m getting double and triple billed for the same service which I can&#039;t even access any longer...

Any suggestions or help is appreciated.

Regards,
Tony</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve had an estibot pro membership since 2009 or so which cost for an annual $149/yr via subscription on PayPal.  Last year, Esa required me to change my payment type to CC and increased the fee to $19.99/mo which I accepted and have been paying.  Over the weekend, I was billed by PayPal for $149 because I guess the subscription was still active so I emailed Esa to give me a refund since it was an old subcription and that I have already been billed on his new monthly fee schedule (double payment).  I forwarded that request to all of Esa&#8217;s known email addresses.  It&#8217;s been over a day now and still no reply and so I went into PayPal and canceled the subscription so that I wouldn&#8217;t get double billed again next year and filed a dispute for the $149 charge.  </p>
<p>I log into Estibot today to find that because I canceled the PayPal subscription, my account membership was canceled as well even though my payment type is clearly by CC and not by paypal.  I have emailed Esa about this issue and asked for my account to be reactivated but don&#8217;t expect a reply from recent experience.  </p>
<p>For me to reactivate manually, I would have to get charged at a new rate of $29.99/mo for the novice level membership.  I think this is all ridiculous as I&#8217;m getting double and triple billed for the same service which I can&#8217;t even access any longer&#8230;</p>
<p>Any suggestions or help is appreciated.</p>
<p>Regards,<br />
Tony</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Morgan Linton is right about minisites by Estibot.com</title>
		<link>http://estibotpro.com/blog/2012/03/morgan-linton-is-right-about-minisites/comment-page-1/#comment-371</link>
		<dc:creator>Estibot.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2012 09:39:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://estibotpro.com/blog/?p=252#comment-371</guid>
		<description>Jayjay, that&#039;s not necessarily true. I have about 100 minisites and they are all hosted on a single VPS which costs $50 per month, and creating the minisites cost about $100 each. They made their initial cost back within a year and they&#039;re clearly making a profit still. I do recognize that if you maintain their ranking by updating the content, your estimate is probably right. 

There is another benefit to minisites: Most domains that I&#039;ve sold due to buyer approaching me are the ones that have minisites and are ranked in the search engines. It really helps domain sales to have some SE visibility, especially on the lower end of the scale of domain names.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jayjay, that&#8217;s not necessarily true. I have about 100 minisites and they are all hosted on a single VPS which costs $50 per month, and creating the minisites cost about $100 each. They made their initial cost back within a year and they&#8217;re clearly making a profit still. I do recognize that if you maintain their ranking by updating the content, your estimate is probably right. </p>
<p>There is another benefit to minisites: Most domains that I&#8217;ve sold due to buyer approaching me are the ones that have minisites and are ranked in the search engines. It really helps domain sales to have some SE visibility, especially on the lower end of the scale of domain names.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Morgan Linton is right about minisites by jayjay</title>
		<link>http://estibotpro.com/blog/2012/03/morgan-linton-is-right-about-minisites/comment-page-1/#comment-365</link>
		<dc:creator>jayjay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2012 19:16:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://estibotpro.com/blog/?p=252#comment-365</guid>
		<description>If you do the math though putting in the time to maintain 100 x ClassBRV.com type mini sites will end up costing you more than their revenue. 

As you point out Google is indeed dropping sites out of the SERP&#039;s that are not updated with new content and links, it&#039;s the cost of doing so 100 x that&#039;s making  it an undesirable path to develop from.  

Your probably better of developing one or two major sites and redirecting similar niche domains in your portfolio to it for traffic links and revenue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you do the math though putting in the time to maintain 100 x ClassBRV.com type mini sites will end up costing you more than their revenue. </p>
<p>As you point out Google is indeed dropping sites out of the SERP&#8217;s that are not updated with new content and links, it&#8217;s the cost of doing so 100 x that&#8217;s making  it an undesirable path to develop from.  </p>
<p>Your probably better of developing one or two major sites and redirecting similar niche domains in your portfolio to it for traffic links and revenue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on New tools you did not know about + how to get your money back and then some by Thomas</title>
		<link>http://estibotpro.com/blog/2012/02/new-tools-you-did-not-know-about-how-to-get-your-money-back-and-then-some/comment-page-1/#comment-364</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2012 18:19:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://estibotpro.com/blog/?p=242#comment-364</guid>
		<description>I guess I&#039;m about to be a customer again. ;-) I need access to some quality lead generation software right now...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess I&#8217;m about to be a customer again. <img src='http://estibotpro.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' />  I need access to some quality lead generation software right now&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Morgan Linton is right about minisites by Thomas</title>
		<link>http://estibotpro.com/blog/2012/03/morgan-linton-is-right-about-minisites/comment-page-1/#comment-363</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2012 17:12:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://estibotpro.com/blog/?p=252#comment-363</guid>
		<description>Nice article - and gosh I love Estibot. ;-)

Definitely agree on the point you bring up - minisites can be incredibly profitable, but you have to put some time and effort into them.

Too many are doing the mass-produced, minimal-if-any original content, plastered with ads mini-sites. Five minutes and they&#039;re done. An hour later they&#039;ve got 15 or 20 of them up and running. I see the point of how THEY are doing things, quantity over quality... But I can vouch for the fact that ONE well-chosen mini-site with a bit of effort will far outshine the mass-produced portfolio - in every way. Especially when it comes to making money.

I like to have a personal garden of about 20. But I develop and maintain and work on these mini-sites, and love it. Choose well, and your mini-site can be the next Big Thing. They can easily pay the bills. I&#039;ve built great, large communities around mini-sites - there is no ceiling. The current Editor-in-Chief of Wired magazine noticed one of my mini-sites and gave it a shout out. Guess how well that site started doing after that!

You never know who will look at your site - spend some time, make it visually appealing and write some content! Update it! 

Okay I&#039;ll get off the soapbox. ;-)

Thomas @Ne1up?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice article &#8211; and gosh I love Estibot. <img src='http://estibotpro.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Definitely agree on the point you bring up &#8211; minisites can be incredibly profitable, but you have to put some time and effort into them.</p>
<p>Too many are doing the mass-produced, minimal-if-any original content, plastered with ads mini-sites. Five minutes and they&#8217;re done. An hour later they&#8217;ve got 15 or 20 of them up and running. I see the point of how THEY are doing things, quantity over quality&#8230; But I can vouch for the fact that ONE well-chosen mini-site with a bit of effort will far outshine the mass-produced portfolio &#8211; in every way. Especially when it comes to making money.</p>
<p>I like to have a personal garden of about 20. But I develop and maintain and work on these mini-sites, and love it. Choose well, and your mini-site can be the next Big Thing. They can easily pay the bills. I&#8217;ve built great, large communities around mini-sites &#8211; there is no ceiling. The current Editor-in-Chief of Wired magazine noticed one of my mini-sites and gave it a shout out. Guess how well that site started doing after that!</p>
<p>You never know who will look at your site &#8211; spend some time, make it visually appealing and write some content! Update it! </p>
<p>Okay I&#8217;ll get off the soapbox. <img src='http://estibotpro.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Thomas @Ne1up?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Morgan Linton is right about minisites by Rod</title>
		<link>http://estibotpro.com/blog/2012/03/morgan-linton-is-right-about-minisites/comment-page-1/#comment-362</link>
		<dc:creator>Rod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2012 17:02:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://estibotpro.com/blog/?p=252#comment-362</guid>
		<description>Sorry, ignore my previous comment - My browser wasn&#039;t showing up the ads. I can see them now :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, ignore my previous comment &#8211; My browser wasn&#8217;t showing up the ads. I can see them now <img src='http://estibotpro.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Morgan Linton is right about minisites by Rod</title>
		<link>http://estibotpro.com/blog/2012/03/morgan-linton-is-right-about-minisites/comment-page-1/#comment-361</link>
		<dc:creator>Rod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2012 16:53:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://estibotpro.com/blog/?p=252#comment-361</guid>
		<description>That sounds encouraging but it&#039;s not obvious how the site is monetized?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That sounds encouraging but it&#8217;s not obvious how the site is monetized?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Morgan Linton is right about minisites by Louise</title>
		<link>http://estibotpro.com/blog/2012/03/morgan-linton-is-right-about-minisites/comment-page-1/#comment-360</link>
		<dc:creator>Louise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2012 16:52:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://estibotpro.com/blog/?p=252#comment-360</guid>
		<description>Hi Esa, thanx for your years of contribution - your site is where I started my education about domains!

My background is SEO. Doing a quick analysis, I see - for whatever reason: scraping, or a dishonest writer - your content is duplicate: http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&amp;site=&amp;source=hp&amp;q=%22Class+B+RV+is+usually+recognizable+by+having+a+bus-like+front+end%2C+attached+to+the+familiar+large%22&amp;btnK=Google+Search&amp;oq=&amp;aq=&amp;aqi=&amp;aql=&amp;gs_l=

Either go after those sites based on DMCA by writing to the host and complaining, or use textbroker for fresh articles, which are guaranteed to not be duplicate, and start over. Nice-looking site!

Maybe the stealers scraped the content and did something bad to your domain that you got penalized, because your content-rich websites are favored by Google, instead of sandboxed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Esa, thanx for your years of contribution &#8211; your site is where I started my education about domains!</p>
<p>My background is SEO. Doing a quick analysis, I see &#8211; for whatever reason: scraping, or a dishonest writer &#8211; your content is duplicate: <a href="http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&amp;site=&amp;source=hp&amp;q=%22Class+B+RV+is+usually+recognizable+by+having+a+bus-like+front+end%2C+attached+to+the+familiar+large%22&amp;btnK=Google+Search&amp;oq=&amp;aq=&amp;aqi=&amp;aql=&amp;gs_l=" rel="nofollow">http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&amp;site=&amp;source=hp&amp;q=%22Class+B+RV+is+usually+recognizable+by+having+a+bus-like+front+end%2C+attached+to+the+familiar+large%22&amp;btnK=Google+Search&amp;oq=&amp;aq=&amp;aqi=&amp;aql=&amp;gs_l=</a></p>
<p>Either go after those sites based on DMCA by writing to the host and complaining, or use textbroker for fresh articles, which are guaranteed to not be duplicate, and start over. Nice-looking site!</p>
<p>Maybe the stealers scraped the content and did something bad to your domain that you got penalized, because your content-rich websites are favored by Google, instead of sandboxed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Morgan Linton is right about minisites by Randomo</title>
		<link>http://estibotpro.com/blog/2012/03/morgan-linton-is-right-about-minisites/comment-page-1/#comment-359</link>
		<dc:creator>Randomo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2012 14:01:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://estibotpro.com/blog/?p=252#comment-359</guid>
		<description>Hi Esa,

I think I had read your minisite piece before, but today I went through it again, and it&#039;s well worth the time, thanks!

-Dave

P.S. I checked out datafeedr - the process looks a little intimidating. (For one of their demo sites, they write, &quot;This building of this site is completely documented in 55 videos.&quot; 55 videos! Sounds like building a site is a huge project.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Esa,</p>
<p>I think I had read your minisite piece before, but today I went through it again, and it&#8217;s well worth the time, thanks!</p>
<p>-Dave</p>
<p>P.S. I checked out datafeedr &#8211; the process looks a little intimidating. (For one of their demo sites, they write, &#8220;This building of this site is completely documented in 55 videos.&#8221; 55 videos! Sounds like building a site is a huge project.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Morgan Linton is right about minisites by Morgan</title>
		<link>http://estibotpro.com/blog/2012/03/morgan-linton-is-right-about-minisites/comment-page-1/#comment-356</link>
		<dc:creator>Morgan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2012 04:31:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://estibotpro.com/blog/?p=252#comment-356</guid>
		<description>Hi Esa!

Excellent post! Thanks for the mention and the kind words!

Best,

Morgan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Esa!</p>
<p>Excellent post! Thanks for the mention and the kind words!</p>
<p>Best,</p>
<p>Morgan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

